Once again, it's been far too long since I've written anything for this blog (or anything non-academic, really)... But I felt inspired to write after attending my small group tonight. We're currently reading "Jesus, Keep Me Near the Cross: Experiencing the Passion and Power of Easter," which is a compilation of 25 essays having to do with Easter or the events leading up to it. (This will probably be pretty scattered, but I wanted to write down some of the things that stood out to me in tonight's readings and discussion, particularly in the hopes that I'll come back and be reminded of them after I've forgotten them.)
In R. Kent Hughes' essay (he is, btw, a former College Church pastor...love Wheaton connections!), he at one point quotes John 18:2–3, which says: "Now Judas, who betrayed him, knew the place, because Jesus had often met there with his disciples."
I'm sure I've read or heard this like a hundred times in my life. But it really struck me tonight, surrounded as it was by the context of Hughes' essay about Jesus' experience in Gethsemane. Jesus went there often in His lifetime, at least throughout His ministry and time with the disciples. Maybe this is too speculative, but assuming that Jesus knew what Gethsemane would be to Him at this crucial moment during His time of prayer and Judas' subsequent betrayal, it seems suddenly very significant that Jesus went there often. I don't think we're really told about any of those times in the Bible, so we don't really know what His previous experiences there were, but the idea occurred to me (and I kind of like it) that on some level, coming to Gethsemane throughout His ministry may have kept the cross constantly before Him. In other words, it seems to me like the very act of coming to the garden may have put His mission on earth and the task to come at the forefront of His mind and experience even while there was still time left before it would happen.
Another interesting thing presented itself while my small group was discussing J. Ligon Duncan III's essay. In it, he talks a lot about Peter's reaction to seeing Judas approach with a bunch of Roman soldiers. Duncan thinks that for as much as Peter clearly didn't understand Christ's mission, on some level, we have to respect him for having the guts to even try anything when there were so few of them and so many of the crowd and the soldiers. People in small group voiced their different views they've always had about this action, especially followed as it was a short time later by Peter's denial of Jesus.
A few things occurred to me while we were discussing this. First of all, Peter and the other disciples still seemed to be under the impression at this point that Jesus' reign was going to be soon and that it was going to be that of a conquering king. In lieu of that, I wonder if Peter was thinking that this was going to be the turning point for Jesus and His followers, the hour at which the conquering part really began. Seeing the soldiers approaching, perhaps Peter thought that this was going to be the moment that Jesus started conquering the Roman soldiers and ushering in His kingdom. I honestly don't know. We're not told; we can't get inside Peter's brain, but I think it's interesting to wonder if that's what he thought, and if that's why he cut off Malchus' ear. Maybe he thought he was leading the charge. Maybe he thought others would follow.
Again, I don't know for sure if that was the case. But if it was, it does kind of explain the denial, which often seems to us so sudden and such an abrupt change of heart from a guy that had just been willing to cut off a dude's ear for Jesus. If Peter had thought that that was supposed to be the moment the conquering began, how confused and even how hurt must he have been when instead Jesus submitted and was arrested? Maybe it even felt like Jesus was letting him down. Peter had been ready to fight to the death for Jesus; now Jesus was in Roman custody. Things looked bleak. The kingdom Peter had expected (and been ready to fight for) seemed impossibly out of reach. It probably seemed like Jesus wasn't who Peter thought He was (and of course, in a sense, He wasn't). Out of that set of circumstances, a denial—even three denials—seems pretty reasonable to me. I sure don't think I would have done any better. In fact, I don't think I would have even stuck around that close to where Jesus was. I probably would have been bitter and disappointed and scared and completely hopeless. But Peter stuck around for some reason. I don't know why, but part of me likes to think that maybe, just maybe, for as much as he had been crushed by the events in Gethsemane, he still had the tiniest shred of hope that something would happen. That Jesus would somehow turn the situation around. Of course, He eventually did, but not in the way Peter may have thought He would.
But it seems like an interesting lesson. I honestly believe if I had been in Peter's shoes, I would have been so quick to doubt and deny once my expectations for what Jesus was supposed to be were shattered just because He didn't do things the way I predicted. Similarly, I think I do that now. How quick am I to doubt God's plan and power when He acts in a different way or a different timing than I would have expected or chosen? Sometimes, I act and think like my view of Jesus has been shattered because things didn't turn out the way I wanted them to. And yet, I need to allow myself—even in those moments of disappointment and even in the face of the invading hopeless that looks to swallow me up—to see the real Jesus that steps out from the broken pieces of the false Jesus I've built up for myself in my head, because the real Jesus is bigger and better and more loving and more perfect than any version I could ever comprehend.