For all four of you that read this, you probably know really well that I don't wanna have kids. A lot of that is that I'm pretty much a tocophobic (check it out...I'm not the only one!). But honestly, the last few months have made me realize it's so much more than that (although seriously...childbirth is just disgusting...and unnatural...which everyone thinks I'm crazy for saying, I know...but childbirth changed as a result of sin, sooooooo it's totally not how it's supposed to be).
Anyway...a few months ago, my grandmom sent me some newsletter she gets with an article in it called "Lady Gaga and the Pornification of America" (you can read it online here). Basically it talks about how Lady Gaga (and other entertainment icons/idols) are transforming pop culture into porn culture. The article also mentions that many of Gaga's fans are young children. Gaga calls these fans her "Little Monsters," and claims to love them (and I mean, she tattooed "Little Monsters" on her forearm and tweets about them all the time, so how could she not be sincere???). I listened to Lady Gaga for a long while. I even owned a bunch of her music. Let's face it...it's REALLY catchy. But a while ago, a friend and I decided to make a pact not to listen to her anymore. And then I read this article. And now I have to say I have absolutely zero desire to listen to her anymore.
Maybe I shouldn't have this double standard, but it didn't seem super harmful to me as a 22-year old who's already pretty well grounded and has, y'know, morals, and is not very likely to fly off the deep end and start dressing and acting like a slut, to listen to Lady Gaga. But the thought of an 8-year old girl (and one is quoted in the aforementioned article) - a child - listening to Gaga's music, watching her music videos, heck, even looking at her outfits...well, honestly, it makes me sick. I could go on about this for awhile, and the damage that Gaga and others are doing to our culture, but ya'll probably don't wanna read a tome about this.
After reading this article, I was pretty het up for awhile (that's one of my new favorite phrases, I don't even know where I got it, but I think it works)...but after a few weeks kinda moved on with my life. Right now, though, I've started thinking about it again because of a book I'm reading. The book is called "Pure Heart: A Woman's Guide to Sexual Integrity," by Shellie R. Warren, and so far I LOVE it. The church needs people like Shellie to talk honestly and boldly about sexual sin (on that note, check out xxxchurch.com, an organization that Shellie is a part of that is definitely doing that...and there's also a book for men by Craig Gross, founder of the site, on sort of the same subject).
Anyway, today I was reading a chapter of Pure Heart about media and sexuality that talks about how overexposed we are to sex in today's culture. And it makes my heart hurt. Shellie quotes from a conversation she had with her mom about raising kids in today's culture. Her mom said:
"The Bible says there is nothing new under the sun, but in my day, even when you were little, if people wanted porn, they would have to go to the other side of town, be a certain age, and pay for it in a store. Now children can download it on the internet, see sex scenes on regular sitcoms, and look at nearly naked women on billboards. I don't know what I would do if I had to raise you in all of that and still have to tell you not to think about sex."
And I have to agree. I can't even begin to comprehend how I would raise a child in today's culture. The thought just hurts. This is not how it's supposed to be. I just keep coming back to that thought again and again, in all areas of life. I guess the thought of raising a young girl especially hurts (not that boys don't face tons of problems because of today's culture, but my heart particularly aches for girls dealing with all this junk). I mean...look at the magazines for women that are out there right now. Cosmo, Glamour, even Seventeen...almost every single magazine out there is telling girls and women that they're not good enough as they are. And I don't just mean giving hair and makeup advice (for the record, I subscribe to and love InStyle and I think on the whole it avoids the kind of stuff I'm talking about). These magazines constantly inundate their female readers (and anyone who ever goes to a grocery store or CVS or Walgreens) with the message that we are not beautiful enough, that we are not sexy enough, that we are not skilled enough at sex to keep our men, and that we are not wearing the right clothes, shoes, makeup, or lingerie, AND that if we take their advice, everything in our lives will be better. As if some magazine columnist can solve all of our problems. As if she even knows what sex is really REALLY meant to be. It's sickening.
I don't know what else to say. Our culture's views on sexuality are so, so, so, so, so far off base and this makes me heartsick. And I don't think the church is doing that well either (I mean...in my experience the church avoids a lot of the secular problems, but only to find its own). It's just not right. I could probably write a ton more about this subject and lots of related ones, and I'm sure I will at some point, but I've already written a lot and I don't really know where to go next anyway, so I'll close with a few more quotes. The first is from a so-called "sex expert" that Shellie Warren interviewed once. He said:
"Young men learn about sex from porn and young women learn from women's magazines. You put those two people in the dark and all you get is one big mess."I think that sums up the current state of sexuality in our culture right now - one big mess. There is so much work to be done.
My final quote is from Proverbs 31. It talks about the wife of noble character, and it is such a far cry from what Cosmo, Lady Gaga, and Hollywood are telling us women to be:
"A wife of noble character who can find?
She is worth far more than rubies.
Her husband has full confidence in her
and lacks nothing of value.
She brings him good, not harm,
all the days of her life.
She selects wool and flax
and works with eager hands.
She is like the merchant ships,
bringing her food from afar.
She gets up while it is still dark;
she provides food for her family
and portions for her servant girls.
She considers a field and buys it;
out of her earnings she plants a vineyard.
She sets about her work vigorously;
her arms are strong for her tasks.
She sees that her trading is profitable,
and her lamp does not go out at night.
In her hand she holds the distaff
and grasps the spindle with her fingers.
She opens her arms to the poor
and extends her hands to the needy.
When it snows, she has no fear for her household;
for all of them are clothed in scarlet.
She makes coverings for her bed;
she is clothed in fine linen and purple.
Her husband is respected at the city gate,
where he takes his seat among the elders of the land.
She makes linen garments and sells them,
and supplies the merchants with sashes.
She is clothed with strength and dignity;
she can laugh at the days to come.
She speaks with wisdom,
and faithful instruction is on her tongue.
She watches over the affairs of her household
and does not eat the bread of idleness.
Her children arise and call her blessed;
her husband also, and he praises her:
“Many women do noble things,
but you surpass them all.”
Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting;
but a woman who fears the LORD is to be praised.
Give her the reward she has earned,
and let her works bring her praise at the city gate."
I have so many thoughts from this post. Well just have to talk about it on our road trip.
ReplyDeleteAs for the Gaga, she's not original; in trying to be original she's being unoriginal. I don't listen to her music but only know what she represents to a lot of people. Do you think popular culture is going to continue along on this line and go further? My guess is that there will be a lot of different voices, kind of like there is today. But how much longer til we realize there's nothing "new" under the sun?
As for sexuality, Ill only say that images are a huge deal and really mess up a lot of guys. We all know that, but it really sucks and it stops guys from desiring God. I think the less you look at images put out by the media, even if they're just of beautiful people, the better.. give me real live people, with their individuality and personality.
If you were say a youth leader, do you have some ideas of what you would have kids do to get vaccinated from this? Maybe have a lot of young adults talk about their experiences.. more small group and the leaders getting to know the kids personally and outside of church?..
For me looking at the ideal of sexuality, from a biblical and even a Christian philosophical standpoint is really helpful. Looking at the beauty of what it should be makes the messed up errors of the world look sad and sophomoric.
But I want to know what works for other people.
And an interesting thing that affected me was when I realized "sexuality" is not just there in a physical relationship.. that is only a part of it. It is includes everything involved with being male or female-- socially, emotionally, aesthetically, and physically. It involves being a lady or a gentleman. It involves how you live in the world. So even if you're not married, you can still concentrate on the rest of your life as a male or female, and grow up so you will be mature in your relationships.
ReplyDelete(End of monologue)
Yeah, I think that (sadly) Gaga is paving the way for more and more of her kind of "entertainment." And it's tragic...I mean, yeah, her songs are catchy, but aside from that, I don't personally find a lot of value in them. Of course, there's definitely not any moral value, but even musically. They're just songs to get stuck in your head. I've seen a few youtube videos of her before the Gaga transformation took place and she actually has a really good voice...but for some reason she stopped using it. At this point, all she's out to do is push boundaries further and further and also to lose herself completely into her Gaga identity. This is why she's ALWAYS in Gaga mode...you don't ever see paparazzi photos of her out shopping in jeans and a T-shirt, she's ALWAYS completely over the top. And yet...this person, who doesn't even ever show her real self to the world, who constantly has on some crazy, larger-than-life facade, is who kids these days are idolizing. Which is just ridiculous. It's just sick that there are so many young girls out there who really want to be just like her.
ReplyDeleteThe other weird thing about Gaga, in my opinion (I mean, there's like a billion weird things about her, but you know what I mean), is that as much as she's pushing boundaries and singing inappropriate songs and wearing revealing clothing and filming risque videos..........I really don't think she has any sex appeal. Which is weird...but maybe indicative of what happens when we continue to push boundaries like this. We become desensitized to things. It's like how when you're addicted to something, you just keep needing more and more of it, and it just has less and less of an effect on you. And I think this is happening to our culture as regards sexuality. We're continuing to push boundaries and we're losing any conception of what is actually sexy. And I think you're totally right about part of our problem being that we've somehow come to the conclusion that sexuality is entirely a physical thing. And because we keep pushing further and further along, and becoming more and more desensitized to physical sexuality, we're just completely losing sight of it. But you're right, sexuality is supposed to be way more than physical - it's social, emotional, aesthetic, and physical. My goodness, it's just incredible and so tragic how much we've screwed up sexuality.
The book I'm reading also talked at one point about how Satan especially likes going after two things: our sexual lives, and our Sabbath lives. And it's so true. My next post will prolly be about Sabbath-type things, so I won't go on too much about that now.
As far as youth goes, I think we need to talk about sexual topics a lot more. And I'm not just talking about more talks about how everyone seriously needs to sign an abstinence pledge. I'm talking about being bold and open about sexual struggles. Shellie Warren in this book I'm reading keeps saying stuff to the effect of "look, I know this is a difficult topic and maybe the stuff I'm saying and how honest I'm being is offensive or weird to you, but Satan's definitely been bold, and so we need to be even bolder than he is." And I think that's what we need in the church. It's tricky cause a lot of parents might be sensitive to sending their kids to an honest talk about masturbation or pornography, and because you don't know for sure that everyone will take it seriously and really listen, but I think it needs to be done. I personally think that it'd probably be best to wait until high school or so, but when the kids are old enough to have these talks, they need to be exposed to honest conversation about this kind of thing. I think small groups and Bible studies should definitely play a big role in this. It's a lot easier for kids that age to talk openly about this stuff if their crush isn't sitting a couple seats down. But I think a lot of the key is that it has to start with the leadership. You can't just sit a bunch of kids down and say "hey, I know that most of you have struggled sexually, so confess your sins already." But I think if a leader is willing to be vulnerable in that way, that that can break down some barriers and let the kids know that it's okay to talk about this stuff. A lot of the reason sexual sin is so tough to beat is that we never expose it to the light. And when sin remains in darkness, it's practically impossible to beat. Plus if we can really talk honestly with some of these kids about this stuff before they get into the whole dating game, I think we could possibly save a lot of them from even falling into some sexual sins themselves. I think a lot of high school kids, especially girls, are just REALLY naïve about sex (I know I was), so that when they're faced with sexual temptation for the first time, they don't really know what to do with it. And I think if we just talked more openly about it, we could help them with that.
ReplyDeleteOne more comment, then I'll stop (for now), I promise...
ReplyDeleteAs far as what you said about guys being visual goes.......it's ABSOLUTELY true. And I think that's another thing girls really don't realize. I was driving somewhere with my mom one time and she had on some Christian talk radio channel and they were talking about how visual guys are, and how even going to the mall can be such a struggle for some guys because of all the advertisements there, and how even going to CHURCH can be a struggle because of the outfits girls wear. It's one of those things that OBJECTIVELY, I knew that. Everyone always talks about guys being visual. But I really think that was the first time I'd heard it talked about in depth like that. And I think guys (friends, dads, brothers, youth pastors, etc.) really need to TELL girls these things. I know that personally, I'm just (usually) NOT a visual person, so I don't really think about these things. But they're important, and girls need to be taught to understand these things and change their actions (or outfits) accordingly. So I think that's another thing that youth groups could potentially address...
Another part of it, I think, is that when girls hear stuff like "guys are visual people and it's easy for them to really struggle/be tempted with images" or even other stuff about guys' sexuality and how they're wired......it's really easy for girls to think (and I've talked about this with several people) "oh, that's BAD guys, not the guys I go to school or church or youth group with....not the guys I'm friends with...." or whatever else. I think that's really indicative of how the church treats sexuality......we're taught that having sexual desires is a bad thing, so for a lot of girls, when we hear about stuff, we think "okay this must be the bad guys." But it's not. And it's dangerous to venture into the dating world thinking that. I think this is another thing that greater boldness and openness and honesty would really help to alleviate. And it would help girls to go into the dating world protected because they would understand how guys work better.
Anyway.....I'll stop monologuing now......
She's not that attractive, no. So is she popular *because* she's on the edge or in spite of it? Her music is legitimately cool. All celebrities can get away with some dumb stuff. It does seem to me (as if I had enough knowledge of this stuff to say anything definitive) that the most attractive celebrities also tend to dress the most tastefully.
ReplyDeleteWhat is the message that she's trying to get across to her fans? It's about being yourself and standing up for yourself, right? But it does seem like her method of making your own way in the world is to use sex as a tool, and it's a tool that seems to have worked for her. It's a new spin on the oldest profession. She's selling, if not sex, at least her honor or purity for money, fame, and influence, and she seems to be encouraging her fans to do the same. Because let's be honest, any girl who knows how to use sex craftily can pretty much get her way with most men most of the time. It is a source of real power, and in a culture that places no real value on honor or purity but does place value on power, that looks like a better-than-fair transaction. That said, I think Gaga had to be a natural result of the culture before she could be a force within it. She's the embodiment of a value system that's been dominant for quite a while now.
Jacob, I personally think she's popular because she's on the edge. Americans are really good at getting really bored, even when we have so much going on all the time, so I think that we embrace any sort of novelty, especially in our entertainment. Even classical music has gone this route - as a composer, I know that there is SO much pressure for musicians to always be doing something new and different...every new piece needs some sort of gimmick, to put it kind of cheaply. But back to Lady Gaga, we LOVE hearing about how crazy is. Every time she dons a costume made of meat or makes some new provocative video, we LOVE to talk about it. Even if it's just to say how crazy we think she is and shake our heads at her and her little monsters.
ReplyDeleteI wonder, what about her music do you find legitimately cool? I think it'd be really fascinating to survey a bunch of random Americans and ask them that: what actually draws you to Lady Gaga?, and what attracts you to her music?
Bretterson posted this article on my fbook (http://www.scriptoriumdaily.com/2011/02/17/born-this-way-so-raise-your-glass-all-you-fireworks/). I think one of my favorite parts of it is where the author says "These singers celebrate themselves by bringing their fans into the circle of self-celebration. 'It's all about you, by which I mean me.' " Also, his whole last point (number 5) talks more about how all of this talk about being yourself and how it's okay to be different is just more and more self-promotion on the singer's part. I'm interested to see where Gaga's career goes now, though...since I don't listen to her anymore, I haven't heard "Born This Way," but from what I've read, it's less provocative and unique than her other music (or at least her other singles), and doesn't really stand out from a great deal of the other music that's on the radio. It seems possible that now that she has achieved icon status with her edginess, she is now going to start getting back to her really talented NYU-trained singing roots and more message-oriented songs (rather than just catchy and somewhat inane, yet danceable, tunes). Of course, "Born This Way" has already become a gay rights anthem. We'll just have to wait and see where all this goes, though. If this comment wasn't long enough for you, I'm also copying links to a few other interesting articles I came across (http://www.quadnews.net/mobile/arts-and-entertainment/little-monsters-eat-up-born-this-way-1.2475355 and http://thesop.org/story/20110220/lady-gaga-praises-cover-of-born-this-way-that-deletes-gayfriendly-lyrics.html).
I agree that being on the edge gave her the novelty that it took to get popular attention. But it's important that she's *on* the edge and pushing it gradually rather than going totally overboard without some preparation. Things that are too far beyond the edge are noticed and forgotten (not to say that she won't be forgotten in time, but that if she hadn't at least started basically in line with the culture, she would never have gotten mainstream fame to begin with). Every time she does something new and disgusting, it shocks me, but perhaps I ought to be concerned about how unsurprised I am with it.
ReplyDeleteAs for what's cool about her music, well, you know me and my tendency to hear only pitches and rhythms, not lyrics. There's a chord progression in one of her songs (I don't remember which one...it's been a while...but it might be Poker Face) that I loved and others that I've liked. She's got simple, catchy melodies. None of her songs are musically adventurous, and in casual listening I always prefer music that does an old thing with a degree of practiced skill to music that does something exciting and so new that the techniques used aren't well developed.
The first article you mentioned was interesting, particularly the second point and the phrase "primal celebration of life itself." I've been thinking lately about the value of celebrating life, and I would normally consider the "primal celebration of life itself" to be only a step away from worshiping the God who made the life in his image. True celebration of true life is not self-affirmation at all. Only a life that is already at least partly dead needs self-affirmation to survive.
But to go back and beat a dead horse again, what it's describing is totally mainstream, and has been for a number of years. "You" was the Time Magazine Person of the Year in 2006. I remember the cover - it was a mirror, and just looking at it made me feel narcissistic. I did a bit of wikipedia-ing, and it's been going on a lot longer than five years; in 1975, they picked American Women, and in 1966, it was The Generation Twenty-Five and Under. I find the similarities between the American feminist movement around 1975 and the homosexual movement today to be intriguing. Ditto on encouraging rampant self-glorification among the young people of 1966 and today.
I'm not saying that there isn't a context for her edginess. If Lady Gaga appeared in the 50's and started acting...well...like Lady Gaga, obviously that wouldn't have gone over well in mainstream culture. But I do think that right now she's pushing things *significantly* further than anyone else (at least in pop culture).
ReplyDeleteWhat do you mean when you say that you "would normally consider the 'primal celebration of life itself' to be only a step away from worshiping the God who made life in his image"?
I think half the point of that article was that this is what is happening in pop culture today. I could think of a bunch of other songs to add to his list just off the top of my head. But I think a lot of his point was that even though the songs are telling people to celebrate themselves and that they're all awesome, the songs actually point back more to the singers themselves than to their audiences. But of course self-worship isn't new and it's not exactly avant garde. It's pretty much been around since the beginning of time. It's hardly just a post-20th century development.